Solutions — Newsrooms
Your press review,already prepared.
For editorial teams: every source read by morning, ranked by your criteria with reasons attached, discussed with your team — and pitched to the conference before ten.
Overview
We built this with journalists — literally. A newsroom handed us their wishlist for what AI should do for editorial work; most of it is product today, and what isn't is labeled honestly below.
Feature
Every source, read by morning
The daily digest reads like a press review: ranked, capped, grouped by the reason each piece surfaced — with the full firehose one click away. Lektor, the AI screening colleague, marks what matters and quotes the passage that makes it so.
Feature
Watchlists that actually alert
Early accessKeyword and entity watchlists — shareable with the whole desk — fire real alerts when something new lands. No more refreshing feeds to feel safe.
Feature
Ranked by your rules, with reasons
Set your own relevance criteria and every article carries its rating plus a short "why". Priority you can trust, because it argues its case instead of hiding behind a score.
Feature
Collect, annotate, decide together
Star coverage into shared boards, chat across the whole collection, leave team notes on any article — and flag what doesn't belong, with reasons that make tomorrow's selection smarter.
Feature
From coverage to conference
Coming soonA briefing from any collection works today. Coming soon: a pitch format built for the Redaktionskonferenz — and "spin it further" suggestions for follow-up angles.
Feature
A press review with receipts
Every summary and briefing cites the coverage behind it, so the morning Presseschau holds up when someone asks "where is that from?"
How it works
How it works
Plug in your sources
Trade press, competitors, agencies, regulators — paste URLs, done.
Wake up to the digest
Ranked, reasoned, already read once by Lektor.
Triage as a desk
Stars, notes and not-relevant flags, shared across the team.
Pitch and publish
Briefings with citations; conference pitch format coming soon.
A day in the loop
A day with Blinkin
Morning
06:40 — the digest is ready: nine pieces ranked with reasons, Lektor's marks on three of them. The editor reads the press review over coffee instead of assembling it.
Midday
The desk stars coverage into the topic board and chats across the collection to test an angle; two pieces get flagged 'doesn't belong', with reasons — the selection learns.
End of day
A cited briefing goes to tomorrow's conference. Nothing in it rests on memory; every line links to coverage.
Proof
Proof
PlaceholderHealth-insurer communications team
0×
Weak signals surfaced days earlier.
Industrial inspection program
0
Field photos to structured checklist review.
Operations knowledge team
0%
Answers grounded in approved documents only.
Questions
FAQ
Will AI decide what's relevant for us?
No — you set the criteria, and every rating shows its reasoning. The desk stays the editor; the system does the reading.
Can the whole desk share one setup?
Yes. Sources, watchlists, boards and notes are team-scoped, with personal reading state kept separate.
What did journalists actually ask for?
A shared collection space with chat, watchlists with real alerts, rankings with reasons, team notes, and a feedback loop for bad picks — that wishlist shaped this page, and most of it is live.
Does it watch forums and social media?
Not today — Radar covers articles, feeds and watched pages. Broader source types are on the roadmap, and we'd rather say that than promise it.
Governance
Governed by design
EU hosting
Per-organization data isolation
Full audit trail
Review-gated knowledge
Works with any AI model
Next step